Sunday, July 20, 2008

Larry breaks the Law

So after some investigation into the law in illinois state about death certificate, I stumbled upon the following:




Death records are not public records and are only available to those who have a personal or property right interest with the decedent. If you are not a relative of the deceased person, a letter or document from the office or agency that needs the death certificate must accompany the request.




http://www.idph.state.il.us/vitalrecords/deathinfo.htm">read about it yourself





So Larry, which law was broken? Did you illegally forge a death certificate? Or did you illegally obtain one?

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Larry Posts Donald Young's Death certificate

He has the following heading on the post:

OBAMA PASTOR JEREMIAH WRIGHT ANNOUNCES YOUNG DEATH BEFORE YOUNG IS PRONOUNCED DEAD!


We know that Donald was pronounced dead at 12:30, and that his body was discovered at 7:30. But what was going on in those 5 hours? Well there's a little clue on the upper right hand corner of the certificate.



DOA




dead on arrival. Young wasn't rushed to a hospital. Rather he was found, "unresponsive" and the police continued their investigation. Once finished he was taken to the county medical examiner where he was then pronounced dead. Only the ME can pronounce an individual dead, so it wasn't until Donald's body arrived at the office that he could be pronounced as such.


Now to Larry's allegation. He said Jeremiah announced the murder to the congregation BEFORE he was actually dead. But there is no proof of this. TUCC has THREE services on sunday, 7:30, 11, and 6pm. The news special says that Wright announced it to the church. It could have very well been at 6pm. There was also no specification as to when Wright announced it. he could have recieved the news in the middle of the service, so at 1pm or 2pm.



so larry:




How do you know when jeremiah wright announced the death of donald young?







My first question for Larry:


Larry has given several pieces of "evidence" in his favor. Among them is a statement, requested in 2008, that lists Larry's choice hotel "points."

It shows clearly that someone stayed in a IL "choice" hotel and received points for the stay.


Or does it? Larry has for some reason crossed out this line:

"While I cannot authenticate any information you currently have in your possession..."




Larry, Why did you cross out this line and claim that it was "personal information?"


We'll never come to the truth if you don't admit to your lies.

More background: Donald Young

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

SOUTH SIDE Deacon at Trinity United Church of Christ found shot multiple times in his home on Sunday

December 26, 2007
SUN-TIMES STAFF REPORTS

Chicago Police were searching for answers Tuesday about who shot and killed a beloved choir director and teacher in his South Side home.

Meanwhile, funeral arrangements were set for Donald Young, who for two decades directed the choir at Trinity United Church of Christ, a high-profile African-American church.

Donald Young, Choir Director of Trinity United Church, was found murdered.

U.S. Sen. Barack Obama attends the church, at 400 W. 95th St. in the Brainerd community.

Young, 47, also a deacon at Trinity, was found -- shot in the head -- by his roommate Sunday morning, Chicago Police said.

He suffered several gunshot wounds, according to authorities.

When Young's roommate came home about 7:30 a.m., he found the door to the apartment in the 2300 block of East 69th unlocked but closed, police said.

Christmas presents and some jewelry were missing from the apartment, but police have not yet settled on robbery as the motive.

The roommate is cooperating with investigators.

The popular Young also taught fourth grade at the Guggenheim Elementary School, 7141 S. Morgan.

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., longtime pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, said Young "lived and breathed music."

A viewing of Young's body will take place from 4 to 7 p.m. Thursday at the church.

A private wake and funeral is scheduled following the viewing.

Contributing: STNG wire



So who is donald young? From the above article we can establish the following:

1. He was employed as choir director at TUCC

2. He was murdered on Christmas eve

3. He died from several gunshot wounds, at least one to his head

4. Several items were stolen.

5. His roommate found him the next morning, which was a sunday

6. We can assume the church was first to know, as he obviously didn't show up for work.



What does this have to do with larry Sinclair? Well until recently, not much. But Larry has claimed that he was indeed in contact with Mr Young. He claims that young was having a relationship with Mr Obama and was killed in order to keep the story quiet. Larry claims that Mr Obama and Mr Wright were involved in Mr Young's murder.



So Larry's allegations stand as so:

Barack Obama is a homosexual

Barack Obama smokes crack

Barack Obama was with Larry on the nights of November 6 and November 7th 1999

Barack Obama and Larry were both at a bar called "alibis" the night of November 6th

Barack Obama is either a murderer or involved in murder

Reverend Jeremiah wright is involved in murder


Who is Larry Sinclair?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



The answer in short?



a criminal. A whacko. A hero. A political prisoner. It all depends on who you're asking.



But what would he have you believe? Here's a quick summary, in his own words of course. Here is the statement that he made at his press conference at the National press Club in Washington DC:


Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and
trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an
American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing
what I know.


Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and
raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my
background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a
coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will
take and try to answer any reasonable questions.


I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have
made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing
bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado.
These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986.
After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this
year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now
been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”.
I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with
the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have
calendared by the Colorado Court.


I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W.
Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye
Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County
Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County
District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997.



The Incident
I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in
O'Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the
graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy
Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on
location to the Navy Training center.


On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both
November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I
now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize
and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who
knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a
friend of his.


On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant
– Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State
Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving
at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was
introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I
mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to
“coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a
telephone call – and this too is significant -- from his cellphone to a presently unknown
individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.


Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an
unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars
($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he
gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama
produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama
smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the
time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my
hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.


The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where
we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama.
Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug
dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements.


Fall 2007
In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to
request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of
crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the
Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to
return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number.
From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did provide a
total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had
changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to
early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young”
stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was
in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted
concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this


“Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I
had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or
anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug
allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few
days.


In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which
time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama
rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature.
“Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had
now changed to a Delaware number.


In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr.
Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was
discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in
1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug
incidents with any media at that time.


In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised
me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to the last time he used drugs and I
did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself.


The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it
clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of
crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information
from me for Senator Obama’s use.


I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity
United Church of Christ – Obama's now-former church -- and was openly a homosexual. I also
learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007.


I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them
the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in
the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and
Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175;
612-466-1043.


2008
In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a
video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with
Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of
what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing
falsehoods circulating on the internet.


In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that
test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all.
I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have
been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton
pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are
junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results
by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the
legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that Whitehouse.com’s
own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator
Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception
by me. That's about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.


Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com
received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to
publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but
instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post
the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even
removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had "had enough of the attacks
by Sinclair's supporters and Sinclair himself.”


The polygraph results - as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger
community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an
attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the
proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the
identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and
relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date,
though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to
move forward so this evidence may be obtained.


In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the
next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without
the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an ad
hominem attack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I
am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the
limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young
and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but
which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:
1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone
records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time
period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?



2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone
records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama for
September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?


3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both
personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from
January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod
and David Plouffe?


4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from
AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and
Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February
29, 2008?


The purpose of this blog will be to tell the WHOLE truth. If his story ends up being true, then so be it. If it is a lie, that's the conclusion we'll come to. Whether or not Larry admits it, a lot of parts of his story don't add up. I'd like to sort through those holes and see what possible explanations there could be. It is my hope that as we continue to post questions raised by his allegations, we'll come to the truth. I'm well aware that there is a blog already dedicated to debunking Larry's story, but that's not what I plan on doing. my goal isn't to prove it true or false, rather it's to figure out what, if anything, actually happened. It is also my hope that Larry, in an attempt to prove the veracity of his story, will make an appearance every once and a while in order to answer the questions raised by his actions and clear up this...misunderstanding.



And who am I? Well that isn't important :)

-Mrs. D